In Search for a Paradigm

I’ve discovered something. People don’t comment here when I say something particularly profound. Or at least, they don’t comment when I talk about something esoteric and theoretical. The only assurance I have of a good readership happens when I talk about making a fool of myself.

Fortunately for all of us, I’m in no danger of letting up on the foolishness.

Unfortunately, for nearly everybody, the sort of things I really like talking about are a little bit obscure. I apologize for that. I think about my experiences, including the experience of reading what I read; and I really like to talk about what I think.

Mostly what I’ve been thinking about is what I’ve been reading, and I’ve been reading a lot.

Right now I’m taking two seminary classes by correspondence and doing a lot of blog-reading on theology and Christian practice from a lot of backgrounds. There’s a reason for this: The more I think about it, and the more I pray about it, the more I come under a full conviction that I’m called to “full-time ministry.” (woo.) I don’t know if that means working in a church, or teaching in a school, or what, but the gifts and callings of the Lord are without repentance. If I was called 8 years ago, I’m probably called now. For whatever reason, the He’s taken me the long way ‘round, but that’s okay. I’ve learned a lot by going the long way ‘round.

One of the things I’ve learned, or at least come to the conclusion of, is that the tradition I grew up in doesn’t have it all together. There are a lot of things that non-denominational Charismatics have got right, but they seem to have a few inherent flaws.

The first one is that total independence of each church from every other is not necessarily a good thing. I’ve heard lots of people from the non-denom tradition criticize all the denominations in a lump for being “sectarian.” I’ve even heard the epithet “demonations.” And there is some truth to the criticism. My pastor, for instance, warned me carefully when I was choosing a seminary, that I should really pick a Baptist seminary, because a Baptist church would be very reluctant to hire me if I didn’t have a degree from a Baptist school. However, I’m not so desperate as *that* for a job at a Baptist church.

Sectarianism *is* a problem. It’s silly to look down on another group just because they’re not a member of *your* group, or because they don’t say exactly the same thing as you when you baptize people. But total independence is not the right solution. A totally independent church can be just as sectarian by refusing to work in conjunction with any other church in town—a typical problem for independent megachurches. What’s more, a totally independent church can be put at a loss to *find* a church that wants to coordinate with them, which is a more normal problem for smaller independent churches. For instance, I just think youth camps are better when they’re run by a conjunction of 3 or more area churches who are in agreement.

The other thing that non-denominational churches tend to miss is theology—though, I understand this is a more widespread problem. Charismatic non-denoms have teaching (oh, have we got teaching!), but what they’re lacking is a really thorough systematic understanding of what they believe. I’m not looking for a set of doctrines that says it’s got every corner nailed down (I checked into and rejected a seminary that listed its precise creed, and proceeded to announce that every professor had to sign agreement with the creed and announce if their opinions ever changed.), but it would be nice to have a fleshed out structure, rather than a pointilistic faith.

An example: I confessed my faith in Jesus Christ and was baptized when I was somewhere around 4 or 5. I had a “salvation” experience when I was around 11 or 12, where I realized how thoroughly bad a sinner I really am, and asked for His power to come and change me. I think I was around 19 when I started to do some real research on what the gospel really means and how it really works in people’s lives. I had to do that research myself, though, because “doctrine” was not really a matter of discussion—even in the ministry school I was attending!

So I’m doing a lot of reading right now to see what I can do to counteract these flaws. There’s no sense reinventing the wheel, so I’m checking into what as many people are saying as possible to see if I can get a better picture. In the next couple of days, I’m going to be doing a roundup of the sorts of things I’ve been leaning and discovering. I don’t know if that’s interesting to anybody else, but it’s interesting to me, and the things that are interesting to me are the ones I’m going to talk about.

Unknown's avatar

Author: KB French

Formerly many things, including theology student, mime, jr. high Latin teacher, and Army logistics officer. Currently in the National Guard, and employed as a civilian... somewhere

8 thoughts on “In Search for a Paradigm”

  1. “Im going to talk about the things that interest me.”

    God for you. I don’t get many comments on my blog either although the stats show alot of readers. But then, I also talk about the heavy stuff as you do.

    I’m glad you are tackling the Charismatic/Pentecostal world since I am doing the same..theologically that is. And you are right…they need a more systematic theology and scads more trained pastors. When pastors cannot understand the original Biblical languages, haven’t even read through the Bible, then their churches are in trouble, no matter how much “revelation” or “anointing” those pastors might think they have.

    By the way, you would be surprised at how many “reformed” (as in Reformation theology) Pentecostal/Charismatic bloggers there are. I am one.

    I don’t recall if you said which seminary you are attending? Or do you want us to know? LOL.

    Like

  2. just for the record — you were 6

    point 2 — mostly what you’re referring ti is what has been a problem for a long, long, time. Those Christians who have the Spirit but don’t know the Word [which is what Theology boils down to] and Christians who know the Word but not the Spirit — but God has promised a generation was coming that would be truly filled with His Spirit and would walk according to His Word [the sum of the knowledge of God — th whole counsel of God] Personally, I’ve always expected it to be your generation.

    Like

  3. Ha. I’m going to Gordon-Conwell, though that may change based upon what happens after I get married.

    The Evangelical Presby Church is actually what I’m leaning toward, but I’m still getting to that.

    See, it’s not so much that Charismatics don’t know the word, it’s just that they’re disjointed. There’s no clear structure in place for understanding how the teaching on eros/agape, for instance, works with the teaching on forgiveness, or the power of the spoken word, or FAITH. We believe all these things separately, but not particularly in conjunction.

    Like

  4. I did have one discenting thought. The downside of “systematic theology” is bringing to a “logical” conclusion what God has only revealed in part, forgetting that His ways are above our ways and His thoughts, our thoughts. We, as humans, do enjoy connecting the dots and we’re uncomfortable without a complete picture….but He doesn’t always give us one — for whatever reason, He’s very fond of faith. 🙂

    Like

  5. But see, a “true” theology would take that into account and acknowledge when a concept *cannot* be taken to a “logical” conclusion based only on what God has already revealed. An honest theology is one that is willing to be uncertain when the answer is not clear.

    Like

  6. Then I don’t think that I’ve met any “honest” theologians then. What do you think all the “fighting” has been over…..everyone arguing over what God hasn’t revealed [eschatology being a good example]

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.