Milk Guzzling is Approbatious

Valerie – my fiancé – has this… fetish… with milk.

I don’t get it. I’m just not into that sort of thing. Now, I like milk. I like it in my coffee, and in my cheese; I like it in yogurt and chocolate bars. I even like it straight – with 3 or 4 tablespoons of Ovaltine mixed in. But Valerie – whew! – she likes *milk*. Just milk. I have personally seen her drink a full gallon of milk over a period of a weekend. Straight. No chocolate syrup or pancakes (which need washing down) or anything. Just straight milk. It’s… it’s… eww!

So. I came into the room the other day and was picking up some thing and as I was heading out, she said, “wait!” and grabbed her glass of milk. Now, I try to stay pretty tolerant of my darling’s little habits, but this was way too much. She wanted me to take her glass into the kitchen, which glass was still mostly full. Her solution was to drink the *entire* thing – just guzzle it – right there on the spot. Right in front of me.

It’s not so much that she was drinking milk in front of me. I’ve gotten used to that. It’s the fact that she was going to slosh it all down like it was lemonade on a hot summer day, like it was Gatorade and she’d just finished competing in the Olympics, like it was **all** ***O-K***. Really.

And I watched her as she poured it down, as if swallowing wasn’t even necessary, and I’d had enough. I had to say something.

So I said the most condescending thing I knew to say:

“Milk guzzling is approbatious.”

“What?” she said.

“Milk guzzling… is… approbatious.”

“Okay. What does that mean?”

“It means… worthy of approbation,”

“And? What does that mean?”

“Scorn. Derision. Something like that… Um, I think.” I said, frantically scurrying. This was not turning out as I had planned.

“Uh huh.” She raised a quizzical eyebrow, once again prooving her superiority. I have no quizzical eyebrow -raising capacity, a fact which she constantly throws againt me. “”Why don’t you go look it up?” she asked.

“Alright… Where did you hide my dictionary?”

(This was the moment of truth for me. I’m the wordy one. I like being the wordy one. I like words. But sometimes I overshoot a little and throw out a word that I’ve heard somewhere when I only have a partial idea how to use it. Usually I can catch it. Usually it means exactly what I intended. But sometimes… sometimes…)

I found the dictionary and brought it to the bedroom. And I looked up my newfound word of condescension.

“Here it is. Approbation… Approval.”

I ducked my head and left the room to the sound of pealing laughter. Somehow, I have the feeling that our milk budget may exceed the means of your average lexicologist.

Leto Atreides

One of the things my company does is to give out a monthly free offer. Usually it’s a Christian book or CD that we think people might like. It’s just a nice way of keeping in touch with our donor base. These books aren’t only available to previous donors, but to anyone who asks. However, sending a free book requires taking down your name and address, and in today’s telemarketer sensitive, spam weary world, that can be a touchy issue. People can always request not to be put on our mailing list even though they’ve requested the free offer, but some people are still too afraid to trust us.

Today I saw an order that took the cake: The order was for our most recent offer, and the address was valid. But the name listed was “Leto Atreides”

Leto Atreides happens to be a character in the *Dune* science fiction series.

Church Services

John at [Rabe Ramblings]( http://johnrabe.blogspot.com), has posted some comments regarding Willow Creek Church’s move to start “satelinte campuses,” using the franchise model (to quote a quote):

>”When Starbucks opens up a Starbucks,” Tomberlin said, “people expect it to be Starbucks, not a mom-and-pop coffee shop. There’s a lot of meaning in the Willow brand.”

I’m going to go with Mr Rabe here: [Yuck.]( http://johnrabe.blogspot.com/2005_01_01_johnrabe_archive.html#110615683598267399)

If you’re planting multiple churches with the same name and same basic order of service, you’re not a single church. You’re a denomination

While I’m at it, I thought I’d present a few thoughts on my ideal church setup…

Continue reading “Church Services”

Dead Birthday Cake

Today is my birthday.

KB took me out, I had curry chicken (yum) at the Bombay Grille, he got me a yummy cookie cake from the Great American Cookie Co., I got a nice nap, and then on the way into the building of my dorm I dropped most of the cake that I was going to share with my hall mates (I am very sad….no one should drop their birthday cake three flights of stairs away from sharing it while trying to get through an access card door). I’ll live tho. I did manage to save two pieces (dropped 6-8 pizza slice size pieces). I’m going to go to bed and eat my cookie pieces tomorrow. All in all it was a nice birthday.

Hope you all have a wonderful week and that you had a restful day on my birthday.

Peace and Blessings.

Date Night

Valerie and I have been discussing how we want to run our marriage for some time now, and the subject has come up recently of “date nights.” Valerie really wants to have a weekly date night. My response has been somewhat apathetic. I’m not opposed to going out (good heaven’s no!), and I see the argument that you don’t want to get caught up in the day-to-day of things and start ignoring the happiness of your family, but… I guess my reaction to having a scheduled date night is something like having an adult bed time. Yeah, I should go to bed at a decent hour, but a bed time?

Now, [TulipGirl](http://www.tulipgirl.com/mt/archives/000549.html) has a post up on some other problems with the idea of a date night. It’s pretty balanced too.

The problem isn’t with the custom, it’s some of the ideas that come with it. I’d be very happy with a “family night,” a nightly devotion, and any other number of “us” activities, probably all of which we’re going to use. An individualized family is no family at all, and just being in the same room together, no matter what we’re doing goes a long way.

Analyzing Morals

I have a class that I’m taking this semester that used to have me extremely worried and now only has me a little worried. The last CORE class we take here at Queens is an ethics class. Now Queens is a private school that is affiliated with the more liberal end of the Presbyterian Church almost to the point that you don’t see the Christianity at all unless you go down to the dusty tomes of the archives (which I was privileged to work in for two years). My worry was ‘what kind of ethics am I going to be taught in this type of atmosphere?’ I had heard horror stories from former students (including KB) about the class simply smashing liberal platform ideals into the student’s head without a glance at the conservative side. Not only is this unbalanced but it’s also pompous, arrogant and stupid. How can you expect to induce ethical thinking when you’re telling the student’s what to think anyway?
Continue reading “Analyzing Morals”

Who’s He Kidding?

[Jollyblogger](http://jollyblogger.typepad.com/jollyblogger/2005/01/jolly_digest_11.html) writes:

>I have been a bad blogger of late. One of the cardinal rules of blogging is that he who blogs should read the blogs of others. A corollary is that he who blogs should link liberally to others. I haven’t been doing this lately – time has been a bit scarce and so whatever blogging time I have had has been used to do my own posts and I really haven’t been reading too much of others stuff, nor have I been linking.

Heh. Who’s he kidding. I don’t hardly link to nobody. That and the fact that I don’t hardly post, of course, probably explain our phenomenal lack of readership, which right now, I think, consists entirely of family members. Ah, the devotion of family.

Nevertheless, David Wayne has a [great aricle](http://jollyblogger.typepad.com/jollyblogger/2005/01/jolly_digest_11.html) up discussing the meaning of *Logos* in John Chapter 1. Continue reading “Who’s He Kidding?”